For studying these matters, the ideal would be to have observer ratings of the quality of each pass and dig made by a player, such as many teams compile from their study of game video. Lacking such ratings, we can only look at box scores published online. For serve-receipt, moreover, one really needs to find extended or detailed box scores to get good information (here's an example of both a regular and detailed box score being available).
Regular box scores contain each player's serve-reception errors (RE), but not player-specific information on number of serve-receipt opportunities. For the latter, one needs a detailed box score. A confusing aspect of detailed box scores is that, for some matches, a column in the serve-reception section with "O" at the top presents each player's total number of opportunities, whereas for other matches, the "O" column contains each player's number of successful receipts, which need to be added to reception errors to arrive at reception opportunities. The meaning of "O" for any given match can be determined by looking at the opposing team's number of non-error serves.
What formulas can be devised to combine serve-receipt data into a measure of skill at the task? Certainly, receiving a lot serves without error is an important quality. Also, arguably, receiving a large share of the serves directed to one's team is a marker of receipt skill. Someone who receives, say, 40 percent of balls served to her team probably has a wider range of movement and is willing to take more initiative than someone else who receives, say, 10 percent of serves. If a player can receive a lot of balls and do so with very few errors, that's probably someone you want on your team. (Ideally, that player would exhibit not only non-error passing, but also high-quality passing that lets the team's offensive attack run "in system." However, quality ratings are not available online.*)
My first idea for a formula to measure serve-receipt prowess would multiply, for a given match, a player's success rate at receiving serve (non-error receipts over total receipt opportunities) by the proportion of a team's serve receipts the focal player took (total number of serve-receipts is equal to the opponent's number of non-error serves). So, for example, if a player successfully executes .90 of her serve-receipts and takes .30 of her team's receipts, that would yield a score of .27.
The more I thought about it, however, I felt greater weight should be given to punishing serve-receipt errors. To do so, I simply converted the first part of the formula to receipt-success-rate squared. If a player makes no reception errors, her success rate of 1.000 remains the same when squared. A player with a low error rate (e.g., success rate of .90) is punished mildly, as the success-rate squared becomes .81. A serve-receiver who is mediocre at best (e.g., success rate of .60) suffers more heavily under squaring, as her value plummets to .36. Thus, my current working formula is as follows (^2 stands for squared):
(non-error receipts over total receipt opportunities)^2 X (proportion of team's serve receipts player took)
Although detailed box scores do not seem to be widely available, Hagglund's school, USC, nearly always provides them. I examined all of SC's Pac-12 conference matches this season, except for the Trojans' loss to Arizona last weekend (for which I couldn't find a detailed box score). Hagglund very rarely botches a serve-receipt, doing so only twice in the seven matches (and 70 reception opportunities) summarized in the following table.
Natalie Hagglund
| Opponent |
Serve Receipt
(Success-Error-Total)
|
% Success (S) |
% of Team's
Receipts (R)
|
(S^2)R
|
| UCLA | 11-0-11 | 1.000 | .136 (11/81) | .136 |
| Utah |
10-1-11
| .909 | .220 (11/50) | .182 |
| Stanford |
8-0-8
|
1.000
|
.136 (8/59)
|
.136
|
| Cal |
23-0-23
|
1.000
|
.237 (23/97)
|
.237
|
| Oregon St. |
3-0-3
|
1.000
|
.086 (3/35)
|
.086
|
| Oregon |
7-0-7
|
1.000
|
.113 (7/62)
|
.113
|
| Arizona St. |
6-1-7
|
.857
|
.149 (7/47)
|
.109
|
However, Hagglund doesn't receive a lot of serves, either, usually between .10-.15 of opponents' launches. Her greatest serve-receipt activity occurred in a five-game win over Cal, in which Hagglund flawlessly passed along 23 of the Golden Bears' 97 non-error serves (.237). Even though the squaring of serve-receipt success rates helps Hagglund (because her success rate is usually 1.000, which is undiminished by squaring), her final scores are not that high, due to her low share of Trojan serve-receipts. (SC outside hitters Sara Shaw and Samantha Bricio regularly field more opposing serves than does Hagglund.) Averaging Hagglund's final scores for the seven matches, she ends up with a value of .143, which is much lower than those for other players we'll review.
Next up is Kristen Hahn. Because of the dearth of this year's Big 12 conference matches for which I could find detailed box scores, I dipped back into the 2012 NCAA tournament (to ensure high quality of opposition). Hahn appears more error-prone than Hagglund, compiling six blown receipts in the five matches examined. However, Hahn is much more active on serve-receipt than Hagglund, a trend that has intensified with Cyclone outside hitter (and frequent serve-receiver) Rachel Hockaday finishing her college career last season.
Kristen Hahn (Iowa State)
| Opponent |
Serve Receipt
(Success-Error-Total)
| % Success (S) |
% of Team's
Receipts (R)
|
(S^2)R
|
| IPFW* | 13-3-16 | .812 | .222 (16/72) | .146 |
| N Carolina* | 27-0-27 | 1.000 | .284 (27/95) | .284 |
| Stanford* | 26-2-28 | .929 | .394 (28/71) | .340 |
| Baylor |
16-0-16
|
1.000
|
.364 (16/44)
|
.364
|
| Kansas | 47-1-48 | .979 | .490 (48/98) | .470 |
*2012 NCAA Tournament
Hahn's most recent performance, in Iowa State's five-game win Wednesday night at Kansas, was quite remarkable. She received nearly half of the Jayhawks' serves (48 of 98) and made only one error in the 48 attempted receipts. Hahn compiled a .470 score in the Kansas match and averaged a .321 for the five matches of hers that were studied.
Hahn recently told the Iowa State Daily that, "I think serve receive is a very mental game. I think just making sure that mentally, I’m ready to go... I like to observe their servers during warm-ups and know who the starting servers are and what their go-to zone is and what they practice."
Our third contender is Michigan State's Kori Moster, who Spartan coach Cathy George discussed on the October 21 edition of the Internet radio volleyball show, The Net Live.
Kori Moster (Michigan State)
| Opponent |
Serve Receipt
(Success-Error-Total)
|
% Success
(S)
|
% of Team's
Receipts (R)
|
(S^2)R
|
| Ohio St. |
30-0-30
|
1.000
|
.484 (30/62) |
.484
|
| Illinois |
12-0-12
|
1.000
|
.273 (12/44)
|
.273
|
| Minnesota |
28-5-33
|
.848
|
.308 (33/107)
|
.221
|
| Wisconsin |
15-0-15
|
1.000
|
.176 (15/85)
|
.176
|
Again focusing on this year's conference matches, I found only four of Moster's Big 10 matches that had detailed box scores. In three of these, Moster received serve impeccably. However, Moster made five serve-reception errors October 17 vs. Minnesota, an unusually high number for a potentially elite libero. In that match, the Gophers' Daly Santana served seven aces, at least some of which were at Moster's expense. For the quartet of matches studied for Moster, she averaged a score of .288, slightly below Hahn's.
One other libero I wanted to mention is Rachel Brummitt of Texas Tech (where I'm on the faculty). During 2012, Brummitt twice won Big 12 Defensive Player of the Week (to Hahn's eight times). I was only able to find a detailed box score for one of the Red Raiders' matches this season, against Kansas. In that match, Brummitt successfully received all 11 serves she faced, but these 11 made up a small proportion of non-error Jayhawk serves (11/73 = .151).
If anyone has additional liberos to suggest, please let us know in the Comments section to this blog. Remember, the current entry was only on serve-receipt. Liberos' digging statistics will be examined in a future posting.
---
*As I later learned from VolleyTalk, the FIVB's serve-receipt statistics for international play include a count of how many receipts were "excellent."
